Current:Home > ScamsTexas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status -PrimeWealth Guides
Texas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status
View
Date:2025-04-19 20:14:07
Sixteen Republican-led states are suing to end a federal program that could potentially give nearly half a million immigrants without legal status who are married to U.S. citizens a path to citizenship.
The coalition filed suit Friday to halt the program launched by President Joe Biden in June, saying in court filings that the Biden administration bypassed Congress to create a pathway to citizenship for “blatant political purposes.”
“This action incentivizes illegal immigration and will irreparably harm the Plaintiff states,” the suit says.
Under the policy, which started taking applications Monday, many spouses without legal status can apply for something called “parole in place,” offering permission to stay in the U.S., apply for a green card and eventually get on a path to citizenship.
But the program has been particularly contentious in an election year where immigration is one of the biggest issues, with many Republicans attacking the policy and contending it is essentially a form of amnesty for people who broke the law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement Friday that the plan “violates the Constitution and actively worsens the illegal immigration disaster that is hurting Texas and our country.”
The suit filed against the Department of Homeland Security, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and other Biden administration officials accuses the agency of attempting to parole spouses “en masse,” which the states contend is an abuse of power.
The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press.
The bipartisan immigration and criminal justice organization FWD.us noted the timing of the lawsuit — as Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic nomination for president — and said the program is in compliance with the law.
“The only motivation behind this lawsuit is the cruelty of tearing families apart and the crass politics of hoping a judge might do the bidding of the anti-immigrant movement,” the organization said in a statement.
To be eligible for the program, immigrants must have lived continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, not pose a security threat or have a disqualifying criminal history, and have been married to a citizen by June 17 — the day before the program was announced.
They must pay a $580 fee to apply and fill out a lengthy application, including an explanation of why they deserve humanitarian parole and a long list of supporting documents proving how long they have been in the country.
They apply to the Department of Homeland Security, and if approved, have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get work authorization. The administration estimates about 500,000 people could be eligible, plus about 50,000 of their children.
Before this program, it was complicated for people who were in the U.S. illegally to get a green card after marrying an American citizen. They can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.
veryGood! (116)
Related
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- B.A. Parker is learning the banjo
- At site of suspected mass killings, Syrians recall horrors, hope for answers
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Trump invites nearly all federal workers to quit now, get paid through September
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- Trump's 'stop
- Arkansas State Police probe death of woman found after officer
Ranking
- The 401(k) millionaires club keeps growing. We'll tell you how to join.
- Intellectuals vs. The Internet
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
- Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
Recommendation
$73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
Charges tied to China weigh on GM in Q4, but profit and revenue top expectations
Military service academies see drop in reported sexual assaults after alarming surge
A South Texas lawmaker’s 15
South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment